Introduction to Cost Accounting
The definition of Accounting put forward by American Accounting Association, which is one of the most used and relevant, reads as follows: ‘Accounting is the process of identifying, measuring and communicating economic information to permit informed judgements and decisions by users of the information’. From the above definition it is obvious that accounting is a process which as its end product, has information that is economically worthwhile for decision making. Further, accounting is concerned with providing both financial and non-financial information that will help decision-makers to make appropriate decisions based on informed judgements. This is pictorially represented as follows:
From the above it is clear that cost information or information related to the cost of the product or service is a financial information and Cost Accounting, which is a branch of Accounting, deals with the whole gamut of preparation and presentation of cost information. It is important to note that information provided by the cost accounting system is referred as cost information which particularly includes the following:
There are two other important aspects to the discussion undertaken in the previous lines which are as follows:
It is well known that the double entry system of accounting was initiated in 14945. Since then, till the latter period of Industrial Revolution, cost accounting remained as a small branch of financial accounting. The need for information on internal operation and the competitive business environment ushered by the Industrial Revolution acted as catalyst in the development of cost accounting. Firms, such as textile mills and railroads, were compelled to devise internal administrative procedures to coordinate the various operations involved in the performance of the basic activity of conversion of raw materials into finished goods by textile mills and the transportation of passengers and freight by the railroads. During 1880s, the newly formed mass distribution and mass production enterprises adapted the internal accounting reporting systems of the railroads to their own organisations. But all these along with the adaptations were exclusively focussed on direct labour and direct material (prime costs).
The scientific management movement provided a major impetus to the further development of cost accounting practices. The period 1880 - 1925 saw the development of complex product designs and the emergence of multi-activity diversified corporations like Du Pont, General Motors etc. It was during this period that scientific management was developed which led the accountants to convert physical standards into Cost Standards, the latter being used for variance analysis and control. During the World War I and II, the social importance of Cost Accounting grew with the growth of each country’s defence expenditure. In the absence of competitive markets for most of the material required for war, the governments in several countries placed cost-plus contracts under which the price to be paid was cost of production plus an agreed rate of profit. The reliance on cost estimation by parties to defence contracts continued after World War II .
In India, prior to independence, there were a few Cost Accountants, and they were qualified mainly from I.C.M.A. (now CIMA) London. During the World War II, the need for developing the profession in the country was felt, and the leadership of forming an Indian Institute was taken by some members of Defence Services employed at Kolkata. However, with the enactment of the Cost and Works Accountants of India Act, 1959, the Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India (erstwhile The Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India) was established at Kolkata. The profession assumed further importance in 1968 when the Government of India introduced Cost Audit under section 233B of the Companies Act, 1956. At present it is under Section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013. Many times we use Cost Accounting, Costing and Cost Accountancy interchangeably, but there are differences among these terms. As a professional, though we use interchangeably we must know the meaning of each term precisely.
From discussions in the previous section it is obvious that cost accounting is a specific branch of the Accounting which caters to the financial information needs of the users. Cost and management accountancy primarily accommodates the financial information needs of the internal users, but financial accountancy records and reports which culminates in the preparation of financial statements of an organisation is solely targeted towards the financial information need of the external users. Thus, it would not be an exaggeration to highlight that cost and management accountancy is specifically aligned to the accomplishment of the strategic goal of an organisation as decision making is the epicentre of strategic success/failure. Before entering into the nuances of the academic discipline of cost accountancy it is essential to read into the four basic conceptual issues which are discussed in the following lines.
It is reiterated that the very basic objective of Cost Accounting is preparation and presentation of cost information.
The details of the very basic objective are summarized in the following lines:
The scope of cost accounting is broad and is directed into the operations of the organisation. Thus, a proper functioning cost accounting system ensures the strategic success/failure of the organisation.
● Cost book-keeping - It involves maintenance of records of all costs incurred from their incurrence to their charge to departments, products and services. Such recording is done on the basis of double entry system.
● Cost ascertainment - Ascertaining cost of products, processes, jobs, services, etc., is the important function of cost accounting. Cost ascertainment becomes the basis of managerial decision making such as pricing, planning and control.
● Cost Analysis - It involves the process of finding out the causal factors of actual costs varying from the budgeted costs and fixation of responsibility for cost increases.
● Cost Comparisons - Cost accounting also encompasses comparisons between cost from alternative courses of action such as use of technology for production, cost of making different products and activities, and cost of same product/service over a period of time.
● Cost Control - Cost accounting also includes the utilization of cost information for exercising control. It involves a detailed examination of each cost in the light of benefit derived from the incurrence of the cost. Thus, cost is analyzed to recognize whether the current level of costs is satisfactory in the light of standards set in advance.
● Cost Reports - Presentation of cost is the ultimate function of cost accounting. These reports are primarily for use by the management at different levels. Cost Reports forms the basis for planning and control, performance appraisal and managerial decision making.
● Cost Audit - Cost Audit is the verification of correctness of Cost Accounts and check on the adherence to the Cost Accounting plan. Its purpose is not only to ensure the arithmetic accuracy of cost records but also to ensure that the principles and rules have been applied correctly.
Systems and procedures are devised for proper accounting for costs. Such a system is referred as a cost accounting system. The design of such a system varies significantly and depends on the type of the product/service of the organisation. As such, six types of cost accounting system may be identified. These are listed as under. The most important statutory books are:
Essentials of a Cost Accounting System
A company deploys the cost accounting system to track the raw materials even before the production process begins. Eventually, these raw materials convert into finished goods in real-time. Once the raw materials enter the production, the system tracks and record the use of the materials by crediting the raw material account and debiting the goods in the process account. Thus a suitable cost accounting system will vary according the to the operation of converting raw material into finished goods. But overall a good cost accounting system should possess the following seven qualities.
Installation of a Costing Accounting System
Cost accounting system is a system that accumulates costs, assigns them to cost objects and reports cost
information. In addition to this, a proper cost accounting system assists management in the planning and control of
the business operations as well as in analyzing product profitability. There are several other advantages of a well
defined costing system in an organisation like generating information for decision making, supplying information
to the management for internal control, detailed analysis of costs. However, it is necessary that the cost accounting
system is properly installed in an organisation. The essential elements of such a system is discussed in the previous
section. The following factors should be taken into consideration while designing a costing system.
Limitations of Cost Accounting System
Cost Accountancy is not an exact science but an art which has been developed through theories and accounting practices based on reasoning and common sense. The theories put to use in a particular organisation are often debatable. Conventions and accepted principles of Cost Accounting set the norm on which the cost accounting system are based. Some of the limitations of a cost accounting system are discussed in the following lines.
Cost Accounting lacks the uniform procedures and formats in preparing the cost information of a product / service. Keeping in view this limitation, all Cost Accounting results can be taken as mere estimates.
Accounting is the systematic recording of the financial transactions of a business. The recordation process includes setting up a system of record keeping, tracking transactions within that system, and aggregating the resulting information into a set of financial reports. Thus, the three aspects of accounting are:
Financial Accounting and Cost Accounting – A Comparison
Financial accounting and cost accounting are complementary to each other. They also supplement each other. Financial accounting, as such, is the systematic procedure of recording, classifying, summarizing, analyzing, and reporting business transactions. The primary objective is to reveal the profits and losses of a business. Financial accounting provides a true and fair evaluation of a business. It, therefore, safeguards the interests of stakeholders. Cost Accounting, as such, is a subset of Financial accounting, and is focussed on the process of conversion of raw material into finished goods. As such the cost accumulation process is the basic issue of cost accounting. The differences between cost accounting and financial accounting is presented in a tabular format:
Basis of Comparison | Financial Accounting | Cost Accounting |
Purpose | It is prepared for providing information about the results of the business activities as a whole for a particular period to the users. | The main purpose of Cost Accounting is to provide information to the management for the proper planning, control and decision making. |
Need | Financial Accounts are maintained as per the requirements of Companies Act and Income Tax Act. | Cost accounts are maintained to meet the requirement of the Management. |
Recording | Transactions are classified, recorded and analysed subjectively | In cost accounting, transactions are classified, recorded and analysed objectively according to the purpose for which costs are incurred. |
Analysis of profit | Financial accounting reveals the profit of a business as a whole. | Cost Accounting shows the profit made on each product, job or process. |
Accounting period | Financial accounts are prepared for a definite period. | Cost reports are prepared frequently and submitted to the management according to their requirement which may be daily, weekly, etc. |
Stock valuation | In financial accounts, stocks are valued as per the relevant Accounting Standard (for example, AS 2 specifies that closing inventory should be valued at cost [carrying amount] or net realisable value, whichever is lower. | Cost accounting stocks are valued at cost |
Relative Efficiency | Financial accounts do not reveal the relative efficiency of each department or section. | Cost account provides information on the relative efficiencies of various Plant and Machinery |
Cost Accounting and Management Accounting - A Comparison
Cost accounting is that branch of accounting which aims at generating information to control operations with a view to maximizing profits and efficiency of the company. Conversely, management accounting is the type of accounting which assist management in planning and decision-making and thus is also known as decision accounting. While cost accounting has a quantitative approach, management accounting gives emphasis on both quantitative and qualitative data.
The two accounting system plays a significant role, as the users are the internal management of the organisation. Following table is a pictorial representation of the two accounting systems.
Basis of Comparison | Cost Accounting | Management Accounting |
Meaning | The recording, classifying and summarising of cost data of an organisation is known as cost accounting. | The accounting in which both the financial and non-financial information are provided to managers is known as Management Accounting. |
Information Type | Quantitative | Quantitative and Qualitative. |
Objective | Ascertainment of cost of production. | Providing information to managers to make decisions, and forecast strategies |
Scope | Concerned with ascertainment, allocation, distribution and accounting aspects of cost. | Managerial decision making. |
Specific Procedure | Yes | No. Thus, the scope of management accounting is much broad. |
Target | Recording of cost data (past and present). | It gives more stress on the analysis of future projections. |
Interdependency | Can be installed without management accounting. | Cannot be installed without cost accounting |
Financial Accounting and Management Accounting – A Comparison
The key difference between financial accounting and management accounting is that financial accounting is the preparation of financial reports for the analysis by the external users interested in knowing the company’s financial position. In contrast, management accounting is the preparation of financial and non-financial information, which helps managers (internal user) make policies and strategies for the company. The distinguishing features of the two are presented in a tabular format in the next few line:
Basis of Comparison | FinancialAccounting | Management Accounting |
Purpose | Financial Accounting classifies, analyses, records, and summarizes the financial transactions of a particular period of the company. | Management accounting helps management make effective decisions about the business. |
Application | Financial accounting is prepared to reflect true and fair picture of financial affairs. | Management accounting helps management to take meaningful steps and strategize. |
Scope | The scope is pervasive, but not as much as the management accounting. | The scope is much broader. |
Information type | Quantitative | Quantitative and qualitative |
Inter dependence | It is not dependent on management accounting. | Management accounting is basically decision making accounting and depends on information created by Financial Accounting as well as Cost Accounting. |
Statutory requirement | It is legally mandatory to prepare financial accounts of all companies. (for example in the Indian Context-Companies Act 2013, relevant rules of Accounting standards furnishes the statutory requirements) | Management accounting has no statutory requirement. |
Format | Financial accounting has specific formats for presenting and recording information. | There is no set format for presenting information in management accounting. |
Users | Mainly for potential investors as well as all stakeholders. | Only for management. |
Verifiable | The information presented is verifiable. | The information presented is predictive and not immediately verifiable. |
In this section some of the cost accounting terms, which are of prime importance for conceptualising the subject of cost accounting.
Business | Appropriate Cost Unit |
Car manufacture | Particular brand of car |
Cigarette manufacturer | Packet/piece of cigarette |
Builder | Particular building /Flat |
Audit company | Audit File/Chargeable hour |
Business | Composite Cost Unit |
Hospital | Patient – Day |
Transport (Freight) | Tonne – kilometre |
Transport (Passenger) | Passenger -KM |
Illustration 1
Data for MNQ Company for a particular period is as under:
Particulars | Machining Department | Finishing Department |
Estimated/budget data | ||
Production overhead (₹) | 3,40,000 | 1,20,000 |
Machine hours | 1,70,000 | 4,200 |
Direct labour hours | 16,500 | 40,000 |
Actual results | ||
Production overhead incurred (₹) | 3,60,000 | 1,29,400 |
Machine hours | 1,50,000 | 3,900 |
Direct labour hours | 18,290 | 44,100 |
If it is company policy to use machine hour rate to absorb production overhead in the machining department. The finishing department is more labour intensive and therefore labour hour rate is considered as more appropriate overhead absorption rate. Find out the Overhead Absorption Rates, Under and Over Absorbed Overheads.
Solution:
The overhead absorption rates (OARs), the under and over absorbed overheads are calculated as follows;
Particulars | Machining Department | Finishing Department |
OAR | 340000/ 170000 = ₹2 per machine hour | 120000/ 40000 = ₹3 per labour hour |
Overheads absorbed | ₹300000 (₹ 2 × 150000 labour hour) | ₹132300 (₹ 3 × 44100 machine hours) |
Actual overhead (incurred) Under/Over absorbed overhead |
₹ 360000 ₹ 60000 (absorbed overhead is less than actual overhead, thus under absorbed) |
₹ 129400 ₹ 2900 (absorbed overhead is greater than actual overhead, thus over absorbed) |
Costs are either direct (traceable to the cost unit) or indirect, referred as overheads, which are not traceable to the product and thus has be absorbed to the product on the basis of some pre-determined basis. This is briefly discussed in the previous section. This is pictorially represented as follows:
Raw materials are converted into finished products by a manufacturing concern with the help of labour, plant etc. The elements that constitute the cost of manufacturing are known as elements of cost. The elements of cost include the following:
● Material
● Labour
● Expenses
It is previously noted that each of the above element of cost includes both direct cost and indirect costs which are also referred as overheads. This is pictorially represented in the following diagram in the next page.
It is important to note that all the traceable costs (direct material, direct labour and direct expenses) are grouped together and is referred as prime cost.
Para 4.26 of CAS 1 define Prime cost is the aggregate of direct material cost, direct employee cost and direct expenses.
Thus,
Prime Cost = Direct Material + Direct Labour (Employee cost) + Direct Expenses |
It is previously noted in this study note that the traditional cost accounting system is the absorption costing system which is more frequently used. Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), absorption costing is required for external reporting. This is an accounting method that captures all of the costs involved in manufacturing a product when valuing inventory. The method includes direct costs and indirect costs and is helpful in determining the cost to produce one unit of goods33. thus, absorption costing also referred as full costing or traditional costing is GAAP compliant.
The following is a pictorial representation of the elements of cost and how the same builds up into cost of production and cost of sales under absorption costing system:
This representation is illustrated in the last section of this study note where statement of cost and profit is discussed in detail. This is also referred as Cost Sheet. Though this is recommended in the CIMA document, it is important to note that almost all authors, in their books on Cost Accounting, includes selling and distribution overhead to cost of goods sold (Total cost in the above figure) to arrive at Cost of sales.
Cost Classification is the process of segregating the company’s costs into different categories that gives a fair idea to the decision-maker about the spending pattern. This bifurcation allows teams to efficiently use the data for accounting purposes and financial modelling, leading the management to decide which cost is more important than others.
The Cost Accounting Standard (CAS 1) (Revised 2015) issued by the Council of the Institute of Cost Accountants of India for determination of Classification of Cost. This section of the study note is in tandem with the provisions of the said document.
Para 4.3 CAS 1 state that classification of cost is the arrangement of items of costs in logical groups having regard to their nature (subjective classification) and purpose (objective classification).
Thus, two type of classification (logical groups) is recommended:
A reading of para 6 of CAS 1 suggest five classifications along with some sub classifications, which are:
It is discussed in the previous section that costs can be classified according to its behaviour. Cost behavior analysis refers to management’s attempt to understand how operating costs change in relation to a change in an organisation’s level of activity. These costs may include direct materials, direct labour, and overhead costs that are incurred in developing a product. Management typically performs cost behaviour analysis through mathematical cost functions.
Cost functions are descriptions of how a cost (e.g., material, labour, or overhead) changes with changes in the level of activity relating to that cost. For example, total variable costs will change in relation to increased activity, while fixed costs will remain the same. Cost functions may come in various forms.
CIMA Official Terminology9 states that cost behaviour is the Variability of input costs with activity undertaken. Cost may increase proportionately with increasing activity (a variable cost), or it may not change with increased activity (a fixed cost). Some costs (semi-variable) may have both variable and fixed elements. Other behaviour is possible; costs may increase more or less than in direct proportion, and there may be step changes in cost, for example. To a large extent, cost behaviour will be dependent on the timescale assumed.
The level of activity refers to the amount of work done, or the number of events that have occurred. Depending on circumstances, the level of activity may refer to the volume of production in a period or the number of units sold. From the above discussion it is obvious that, in general, three types of costs is noticed. It is very important to understand the nature of the cost. As the treatment of fixed cost and variable cost is different in the two most important cost accounting systems: absorption costing and marginal costing, and as such semi–variable cost cannot be allowed to remain and should be segregated into fixed and semi–variable cost.
Figure (i): total fixed cost remains fixed and does not change as number of units is increased. This holds good within the relevant range.
Figure (ii): the per unit fixed cost curve is a rectangular hyperbola and reduces as number of units produced increases.
Figure (iii): total variable cost increases at a steady rate as units produced increases.
Figure (iv): the per unit variable cost is a straight line parallel to the X axis. This is one basic assumption which shall have to hold good during the relevant range.
Figure (v): total cost curve comprising of fixed cost and variable cost is represented in this figure. This may be also represented as a straight line curve where the fixed cost is the Y – intercept and the variable cost per unit is the
m (slope of the total cost function).
In both absorption costing system and marginal costing system, costs must be identified as fixed cost or variable cost as their treatment differs because their nature differs. Thus, semi–variable costs are not allowed to remain as they are. These costs are to be segregated into its component parts; fixed portion and variable portion. When managers have identified a semi-variable cost they will need to know how much of it is fixed and how much is variable. Only when they have determined this, they will be able to estimate the cost to be incurred at relevant activity levels. Past records of costs and their associated activity levels are usually used to carry out the analysis. Before segregation of semi-variable costs, managers need to identify the same semi variable cost. The below illustration would clarify the issue.
Example 1
Let us assume that a company identified two sets of costs for two consequent months which are as follows:
January 2022, 60 tables are produced with total cost of ₹ 1700
February 2022, 70 tables are produced with total cost of ₹ 1900
It is a given fact that total fixed costs don’t change within the relevant range with increase in units produced. So the increase in total cost of ₹ 200 (₹ 1900 - ₹ 1700) during January –February is caused by an increase of 10 units
(70 tables – 60 tables)
This is given as
₹ 1900 – ₹ 1700 = ₹ 200 change in costs (increase)
70 tables – 60 tables = 10 change in tables (increase)
Thus, variable cost per unit = ₹ 200 / 10 units = ₹ 20 per table
Thus, the total cost is semi variable in nature as there are both fixed and variable element in the total cost of producing table.
If the total cost is variable, then in January the total cost would be ₹ 1200 (60 × 20) and in February the total cost would be ₹ 1400 (70 ×20), which they are not. The TC in January is ₹ 1700 and in February it is ₹ 1900.
Given, total cost = total variable costs + total fixed costs
For January (60 tables)
TC = TVC + TFC = Variable cost per unit × number of units + TFC
⇒ 1700 = 20 × 60 + TFC
⇒ TFC = 1700 -1200 = 500
Check (for February) (70 tables)
TC = TVC + TFC = Variable cost per unit × number of units + TFC
⇒ 1900 = 20 × 70 + 500
⇒ LHS = RHS
In other words, the cost function is given as
C = TVC + TFC = Variable cost per unit × number of units + TFC
Y = m × x + C
Where
Y = TC,
m = slope of the cost function (variable cost per unit) and
C = y intercept (total fixed cost)
Where,
m= rise/run = (y2 - y1) / (x2- x1) = change in TC/change in output
The four most common methods37 used to separate the fixed and variable elements are as follows:
Example 2
Segregation of Semi Variable Cost (High/Low Method and Linear Equation Method)
The costs of operating the maintenance department of a computer manufacturer, XYZ Company, for the last four months have been as follows:
Month | Cost (₹) | Production volume Units |
1 | 1,10,000 | 7,000 |
2 | 1,15,000 | 8,000 |
3 | 1,11,000 | 7,700 |
4 | 97,000 | 6,000 |
High/Low Method:
Variable cost p.U. = Change in Total cost/Change in output (consider only the height and the lowest points)
therefore
High | 8,000 units | ₹ 1,15,000 |
Low | 6,000 units | ₹ 97,000 |
Change | 2,000 units | ₹ 18,000 |
Variabl cost P.U. = Change in Total cost/Change in output = ₹ 18,000 / 2000 units = 9 per units
Calculations of fixed assets cost element (substituting value of VC in high point and low point)
High point | Low point | |
Total Cost(given) | ₹ 1,15,000 | ₹ 97,000 |
Variable Cost @ ₹9 per unit | ||
8,000 * ₹ 9 | ₹ 72,000 | |
6,000 * ₹ 9 | ₹ 54,000 | |
Fixed Cost (balancing figure) | ₹ 43,000 | ₹ 43,000 |
Linear Equation Method
The Total Cost function is given as:
TC = TVC + TFC = Variable cost per unit * number of unit + TFC
Y = m * x + C
Where
Y = Tc,
m = slopr of the cost function(cariable cost per unit ) and
C = y intercept (total fixed cost)
Where, m = Rise/Run = (y2 - y1) / (x2- x1) = Change in Tc/ Change in output = ₹ 18,000/2000 units = ₹ 9 per unit
At 8,000 units of production,
Variable cost = 8,000 units * 9 per unit = 72,000
Fixed cost (Balancing Figure) = ₹ 43,000
Total Cost (given) = 1,15,000
Thus the total cost function is given as:
Y = 9X + 43,000
TC - Variable cost per unit * units produced + total fixed cost
A cost sheet, also referred as statement of cost, is a statement that shows the various components of total cost for a product and shows previous data for comparison. The selling price (after adding certain percentage of profit to the cost) can be deduced for a product based on the cost sheet. It is depiction of the cost accumulation process of a single output based on a single cost unit. An estimated cost sheet is prepared based on estimated cost just before the production begins.
Under absorption costing system, direct material, direct labour, direct expenses, fixed and variable production overhead are considered as composing the factory (works) cost. Administrative overhead added to works cost gives the cost of production. Selling and distribution overhead adds to cost of production to give the cost of sales.
The term conversion cost is used to represent the cost of converting raw material into finished goods. Thus, conversion cost is the sum of direct labour cost, direct expenses and production overhead. Cost sheet shows the operating results.
Importance and objectives of cost sheet
Grouping of costs
By grouping of the above elements of cost, the following divisions of cost are obtained:
In a manufacturing concern, inventory comprises of
Thus, the above simple grouping may be restated as:
Prime Cost
Details | (₹) | (₹) |
Opening Stock of Raw Material | ** | |
Add: Purchase of Raw Material | ** | |
Less: Closing Stock of Raw Material | ** | |
Add: Direct charges related to Raw Material | ** | |
Raw Material Consumed | ** | |
Direct Labour | ** | |
Direct Expenses | ** | |
Prime Cost | ** |
2. Work (factory) Cost
Details | (₹) | (₹) |
Prime Cost | ** | |
Add: Production Overhead | ** | |
Works (factory) cost | ** | |
Opening Stock of WIP | ** | |
Less: Closing Stock od WIP | ** | ** |
Adjusted Work (factory) cost | ** |
3. Cost of Production and Cost of goods sold
Details | (₹) | (₹) |
Adjusted Work (factory) cost | ** | |
Add: Administrative overhead | ** | |
Cost of Production | ** | |
Add: Opening Stock of Finished Goods | ** | |
Less: Closing Stock of Finished Goods | ** | ** |
Cost of Goods Sold | ** |
4. Cost of Sales
Details | (₹) |
Cost of Goods Sold | ** |
Add: Selling and Distribution Overhead | ** |
Cost of Sales | ** |
5. Statement of Profit
Details | (₹) |
Cost of Sales | ** |
Add: Profit (as a percentage of cost of sales or as a percentage of sales) | ** |
Sales | ** |
It is imperative to note that cost of goods sold is the costs assigned to the units sold. Whereas cost of sales is the total of production costs assigned to units sold plus selling and distribution expenses. It is interesting to note that as per paragraph 13 (c) of AS 2, administrative cost do not form part of cost of production.
Illustration 2
MNQ LLP submits the following information on 31st March 2022. Based on the given data prepare a statement of cost.
Details | (₹) |
Sales for the year | 275000 |
Inventories at the beginning of the year: Finished goods | 7000 |
Work in Progress | 4000 |
Purchase of the material for the year | 110000 |
Material inventory: At the beginning of the year | 3000 |
At the end of the year | 4000 |
Direct Labour | 65000 |
Factory overhead: 60% of direct labour cost | |
Inventories at the end of the year: Finished goods | 8000 |
Work in Progress | 6000 |
Other expenses for year: | |
Selling expenses - 10% of sales | |
Administrative expense – 5% of sales |
Solution:
Details | (₹) | (₹) |
Inventory (RM) at the beginning of the year | 3000 | |
Add: Purchase of RM during the year | 110000 | |
113000 | ||
Less: Inventory (RM) at the end of the year | (4000) | |
Material consumed | 109000 | |
Add: Direct Labour | 65000 | |
Prime Cost | 174000 | |
Add: Factory Overhead @ 60% of direct labour | 39000 | |
Works Cost | 213000 | |
Adjustment for work in progress | ||
Opening WIP | 4000 | |
Less: Closing WIP | (6000) | (2000) |
211000 | ||
Add: Administrative Overhead | ||
@ 5% of Sales (275000) | 13750 | |
Cost of Production | 224750 | |
Adjustment for Finished goods | ||
Opening Stock of Finished Goods | 7000 | |
Less: Closing stock of Finished Goods | (8000) | (1000) |
Cost of goods sold | 223750 | |
Add: Selling overhead | ||
@ 10% of sales (275000) | 27500 | |
Cost of Sales | 251250 | |
Profit (Balancing figure) | 23750 | |
Sales | 275000 |
Illustration 3
X Ltd Provides you the following figures for the year 2021-22:
Particulars | Amount(₹) |
Direct Material | 3,20,000 |
Direct Wages | 8,00,000 |
Production Overheads (25% variable) | 4,80,000 |
Administration Overheads (75% fixed) | 1,60,000 |
Selling and Distribution Overheads | 2,40,000 |
Sales @ ₹ 125 per unit | 25,00,000 |
For the year 2022-23, it is estimated that:
1. Output and sales quantity will increase by 20% by incurring additional advertisement expenses of ₹ 45,200.
2. Material prices will go up 10%.
3. Wage Rate will go up by 5% along with, increase in overall direct labour efficiency by 12%.
4. Variable Overheads will increase by 5%.
5. Fixed Production Overheads will increase by 33
Required:
Solution:
(a) Computation of Cost of Sales for the year 2021-22 and 2022-23
2021-22 | 2022-23 | ||
Sales Unit | ₹ 25,00,000/ ₹ 125= 20,000 | ||
Direct Material | 3,20,000 | 3,20,000 × 120% × 110% | 4,22,400 |
Direct Wages | 8,00,000 | 8,00,000 × 120% × 0105% × 100 / 112 | 9,00,000 |
Prime Cost | 11,20,000 | 13,22,400 | |
Add: Variable Production OH | 4,80,000 × 25% = 1,20,000 | 1,20,000 × 120% × 105% | 1,51,200 |
Fixed Production OH | 4,80,000 × 75% = 3,60,000 | 3,60,000 × 1331/3% | 4,80,000 |
Works Cost | 16,00,000 | 19,53,600 | |
Add: Variable Administrative OH | 1,60,000 × 25% = 40,000 | 40,000 × 120% × 105% | 50,400 |
Fixed Administrative OH | 1,60,000 × 75% = 1,20,000 | 1,20,000 | |
Cost of Production | 17,60,000 | 21,24,000 | |
Add: Variable Selling & Distribution OH | 1/3 × 2,40,000 = 80,000 | 80,000 × 120% × 105% | 1,00,800 |
Fixed Selling & Distribution OH | 2/3 × 2,40,000 = 1,60,000 | 1,60,000 | |
Advertisement Exp | 45,200 | ||
Cost of Sales | 20,00,000 | 24,30,000 |
(b) Profit for the year 2021-22 = Sales – Cost of Sales = 25,00,000 – 20,00,000 = ₹5,00,000
(i) Selling Price of 2022-23 if same amount of profit is to be earned as in 2021-22:
= Cost of Sales + Expected Profit / No. of Sales Unit = 24,30,000 + 5,00,000 / 24,000 = ₹ 122.08
(ii) Selling Price of 2022-23 if the same percentage of profit to sales is to be earned as in 2021-22:
Percentage of Profit to Sales in 2021-22 = 5,00,000 / 25,00,000 × 100 = 20%
Cost of Sales + Profit = Sales
or, 24,30,000 + 20% of Sales = Sales
or, Sales = 24,30,000 / 80% = ₹ 30,37,500
Selling Price per unit = ₹ 30,37,500 / 24,000 = ₹ 126.5625
(iii) Selling Price of 2022-23 if the existing profit to sales percentage is increased by 25%:
Profit to Sales percentage = 20 + 25% × 20 = 25%
Cost of Sales + Profit = Sales
or, 24,30,000 + 25% of Sales = Sales
or, Sales = 24,30,000 / 75% = ₹ 32,40,000
Selling Price per unit = ₹ 32,40,000 / 24,000 = ₹ 135
(iv) Selling Price of 2022-23 if profit per unit of ₹ 10 is to be earned:
Sales = 24,30,000 + 10 × 24,000 = ₹ 26,70,000
Selling Price per unit = ₹ 26,70,000 / 24,000 = ₹ 111.25
Illustration 4
Following data is available from the cost records of a company for the month of March 2022:
(1) Opening stock of job as on 1st March 2022:
Job no. A 99: Direct Material- ₹80, Direct Wages- ₹150 and Factory Overheads- ₹200.
Job no. A 77: Direct Material- ₹420, Direct Wages- ₹450 and Factory Overheads- ₹400.
(2) Direct material issued during the month of February 2022 was:
Job no. A 99 - ₹120
Job no. A 77 - ₹280
Job no. A 66 - ₹225
Job no. A 55 - ₹300
(3) Direct labour details for March 2022 were:
Job no | Hours | Amount(₹) | |
A 99 | 400 | 600 | |
A 77 | 300 | 450 | |
A 66 | 200 | 675 | |
A 55 | 100 | 225 |
(4) Factory Overheads are applied to jobs on production according to direct labour hour rate which is ₹ 2 per hour.
(5) Factory Overhead incurred in March 2022 were ₹2,100
(6) Job numbers A 99 and A 77 were completed during the month. They were billed to the customers at a price which included 15% of the price of the job for Selling & Distribution expenses and another 10% of the price for Profit.
Prepare
(a) Job Cost Sheet for Job No. A 77 and A 99.
(b) Determine the selling price for the jobs.
(c) Calculate the value of work in process.
Solution
Working Notes
The Factory Overheads actually incurred are ₹2,100. This amount to be apportioned on the basis of labour hours. So, the rate to be considered as ₹ 2.10 per unit (= ₹ 2,100/1,000 hours) and not ₹ 2 per unit. If we consider the above mentioned point the calculations for Job Sheets and for the work in progress will change accordingly.
2. Work in progress is to be calculated for the incomplete jobs hence job no. A 66 and A 55 should only be included in the calculations of work in progress.
(a) Job Cost Sheets for the month of March 2022
Cost Items | Job A 77 Amount(₹) | Job A 99 Amount(₹) |
|||
Direct Material Issued | 280 | 120 | |||
Direct Labour | 450 | 600 | |||
Prime Cost | 730 | 720 | |||
Add: Factory Overhead | 2.10 × 200 = | 420 | 2.10 × 400 | 840 | |
Add: Opening WIP | 420 + 450 + 400= | 1,270 | 80 + 150 + 200 = | 430 | |
Factory Cost | 2,420 | 1,990 | |||
Add: S & D Overhead (WN 1) | 484 | 398 | |||
Cost of Sales | 2,904 | 2,388 | |||
Add: Profit (WN 1) | 323 | 265 | |||
(b) Selling Price | 3,227 | 2,653 |
Working Note
1. Factory cost + Selling & Distribution Overheads + Profit = Selling Price
Job A 77:
Let Selling Price be ₹x
⸫ Selling & Distribution Overhead = 15% × Selling Price = 0.15x
and, Profit = 10% × Selling Price = 0.10x
or, 2,420 + 0.15x + 0.10x = x
or, x = 2,420/0.75 = ₹3,227
⸫ Selling & Distribution Overhead = 0.15 × 3,227 = ₹484
and, Profit = 0.10 × 3,227 = ₹323
Similarly,
Selling Price of Job 99 = ₹ 1,990/0.75 = ₹ 2,653
⸫ Selling & Distribution Overhead = 0.15 × 2,653 = ₹ 398
and, Profit = 0.10 × 2,653 = ₹ 265
(c) Calculation of Closing Work in Progress of Job A 55 and A 66
Cost Items | Job A 55 Amount(₹) | Job A 66 Amount(₹) |
Direct Material Issued | 300 | 225 |
Direct Labour | 225 | 675 |
Prime Cost | 525 | 900 |
Add: Factory Overhead | 100 × 2.10 = 210 | 300 × 2.10 = 630 |
Value of Work in Progress | 735 | 1,530 |
⸫ Total Value of Work in Progress = 735 + 1,530 = ₹2,265
Illustration 5
Prepare Cost Sheet for an engineering company which produces standard components in batches of 1,000 pieces each. A batch passes through three processes viz. Foundry, Machining and Assembly.
The materials used for a batch number 001 were: Foundry 1,300 tonnes @ ₹ 50 per tonne of which 50 tonnes were sent back to stores.
Other details:
Process | Direct Labour | Overheads |
Foundry | 200 Hours @ ₹10 | ₹15 per Labour Hour |
Machining | 100 Hours @ ₹5 | ₹20 per Labour Hour |
Assembly | 100 Hours @ ₹15 | ₹10 per Labour Hour |
Solution:
Cost sheet for the batch no. 001
Standard batch size of 1,000 pieces
Cost Items | Actual(₹) | Estimated(₹) |
Variance(₹) | Favourable/Adverse | |||
Direct Material | 1,250 × 50 (1300 – 50) | 62,500 | 62,500 ×100/ 120 | 52,083 | 10,417 | A | |
Direct Labour:Foundry | 200 × 10 | 2,000 | 2,000×110/ 100 | 2,200 | 200 | F | |
Machining | 100 × 5 | 500 | 500×110/ 100 | 550 | 50 | F | |
Assembly | 100 × 15 | 1,500 | 1,500×110/ 100 | 1,650 | 150 | F | |
Prime Cost | 66,500 | 56,483 | 10,017 | A | |||
Add: Factory Overhead: Foundry | 200 × 15 | 3,000 | 3,000×100/ 120 | 2,500 | 500 | A | |
Machining | 100 × 20 | 2,000 | 2,000×100/ 120 | 1,667 | 333 | A | |
Assembly | 100 × 10 | 1,000 | 1,000×100/ 120 | 833 | 167 | A | |
Factory Cost | 72,500 | 61,483 | 11,017 | A |
Working Note:
1. For Material and Factory Overhead
Actual cost is 20% excess than Estimated cost
Let Estimated cost be x
⸫ x + 20%x = 62,500 (Actual Material Cost)
or, x = 62,500 × 62,500 × 100/120 = ₹ 52,083 (Estimated Material Cost)
Similarly, Factory Overhead cost has been calculated
2. For Direct Labour
Estimated Cost is 10% more than Actual Cost
So, Estimated Cost = Actual Cost × 62,500 × 110/100
Illustration 6
An advertising agency has received an enquiry for which you are supposed to submit the quotation. Bill of material prepared by the production department for the job states the following requirement of material:
Paper 10 reams @ ₹1,800 per ream
Ink and other printing material ₹ 5,000
Binding material & other consumables ₹ 3,000
Some photography is required for the job. The agency does not have a photographer as an employee. It decides to hire one by paying ₹10,000 to him. Estimated job card prepared by production department specifies that service of following employees will be required for this job:
Artist (₹12,000 per month) 80 hours
Copywriter (₹10,000 per month) 75 hours
Client servicing (₹9,000 per month) 30 hours
The primary packing material will be required to the tune of ₹4,000. Production Overheads 40% of direct cost, while the Selling & Distribution Overheads are likely to be 25% on Production Cost. The agency expects a profit of 20% on the quoted price. The agency works 25 days in a month and 6 hours a day.
Solution:
Cost Items | Amount(₹) | Amount(₹) |
Direct Material | ||
● Paper | 10 ×1,800 = 18,000 | |
● Ink and other printing material | 5,000 | |
● Binding material & consumables | 3,000 | |
● Primary packing material | 4,000 | 30,000 |
Direct Labour | ||
● Photographer’s Charge | 10,000 | |
● Artist (WN 1) | 6,400 | |
● Copywriter (WN 2) | 5,000 | |
● Client Servicing (WN 3) | 1,800 | 23,200 |
Prime Cost | 53,200 | |
Add: Production Overhead | 40% × 53,200 | 21,280 |
Factory Cost | 74,480 | |
Add: Selling & Distribution Overhead | 25% × 74,480 | 18,620 |
Cost of Sales | 93,100 | |
Add: Profit (WN 4) | 23,275 | |
Price to be quoted | 1,16,375 |
Working Notes:
Cost Items | Amount(₹) | |
1 | Charge per month for Artist | ₹ 12,000 |
Working Hours per month (25 × 6) | 150 hours | |
Actual Hours worked | 80 | |
⸫ Labour charge for Artist = 12,000 × 80/150 = | ₹ 6,400 | |
2 | Charge per month for copy writer | ₹ 10,000 |
Working Hours per month (25 × 6) | 150 hours | |
Actual Hours worked | 75 | |
⸫ Labour charge for Copywriter = 10,000 × 75/100 = | ₹ 5,000 | |
3 | Charge per month for client servicing | ₹ 9,000 |
Working Hours per month (25 × 6) | 150 hours | |
Actual Hours worked | 30 | |
⸫ Labour charge for Client servicing = 9,000 × 30/150 = | ₹ 1,8000 | |
4 | Cost of Sales + Profit = Price to be quoted | |
or, 93,100 + 20% × Price to be quoted = Price to be quoted | ||
or, Price to be quoted = 93,100 × 100/80 = | ₹ 1,16,375 | |
Profit = 1,16,375 – 93,100 = | ₹ 23,275 |
Illustration 7
The following figures were extracted from the Trial Balance of a company as on 31st December, 2022.
Particulars | Debit Amount(₹) | Credit Amount(₹) |
Inventories: | ||
Raw Material | 1,40,000 | |
Work in Progress | 2,00,000 | |
Finished Goods | 80,000 | |
Office Appliances | 17,400 | |
Plant and Machinery | 4,60,500 | |
Buildings | 2,00,000 | |
Sales | 7,68,000 | |
Sales Returns | 14,000 | |
Material Purchased | 3,20,000 | |
Freight on materials | 16,000 | |
Purchase Returns | 4,800 | |
Direct Labour | 1,60,000 | |
Indirect Labour | 18,000 | |
Factory Supervision | 10,000 | |
Factory repairs and upkeep | 14,000 | |
Heat, Light & Power | 65,000 | |
Rates & Taxes | 6,300 | |
Miscellaneous Factory Expenses | 18,700 | |
Sales Commission | 33,600 | |
Sales Travelling | 11,000 | |
Sales Promotion | 22,500 | |
Distribution Department Salaries and Wages | 18,000 | |
Office Salaries | 8,600 | |
Interest on borrowed funds | 2,000 |
Further details are given as follows:
Closing inventories are Material ₹1,80,000, Work in Progress ₹1,92,000 and Finished Goods ₹1,15,000.
Accrued expenses are Direct Labour ₹8,000, Indirect Labour ₹1,200 and Interest ₹2,000.
Depreciation should be provided as 5% on Office Appliances, 10% on Machinery and 4% on Buildings.
Heat, light and power are to be distributed in the ratio of 8: 1: 1 among factory, office and distribution respectively.
Rates & Taxes apply ⅔ rd to the factory and ⅓ rd to office.
Depreciation on building to be distributed in the ratio of 8: 1: 1 among factory, office and distribution respectively.
Prepare a Cost Sheet showing all important components and also a condensed Profit & Loss Account for the year.
Solution:
Particulars | Debit Amount(₹) | Credit Amount(₹) |
Direct Materials | ||
Opening Stock of Raw Material | 1,40,000 | |
Add: Purchases | 3,20,000 | |
Add: Freight | 16,000 | |
Less: Returns | 4,800 | |
Less: Closing Stock | 1,80,000 | 2,91,200 |
Direct Labour | 1,60,000 | |
Add: Accrued | 8,000 | 1,68,000 |
Prime Cost | 4,59,200 | |
Add: Factory Overhead | ||
Indirect Labour | 18,000 | |
Add: Accrued indirect labour | 1,200 | |
Factory supervision | 10,000 | |
Factory Repairs & upkeep | 14,000 | |
Heat, Light & Power | 52,000 | |
Rates & Taxes | 4,200 | |
Miscellaneous Factory Expenses | 18,700 | |
Depreciation on Plant & Machinery (10% × 4,60,500) | 46,050 | |
Depreciation on Buildings (8/10 × 4% × 2,00,000) | 6,400 | |
1,70,550 | ||
Add: Opening WIP | 2,00,000 | |
Less: Closing WIP | (1,92,000) | 1,78,550 |
Factory Cost | 6,37,750 | |
Add: Administration Overhead | ||
Heat, Light & Power (1/10 × 65,000) | 6,500 | |
Rates & Taxes (1/3 × 6,300) | 2,100 | |
Depreciation on Buildings (1/10 × 4% × 2,00,000) | 800 | |
Depreciation on office appliances | 870 | |
Office salaries | 8,600 | 18,870 |
Cost of Production | 6,56,620 | |
Add: Opening Stock of Finished Goods | 80,000 | |
Less: Closing Stock of Finished Goods | 1,15,000 | (35,000) |
Cost of Goods Sold | 6,21,620 | |
Add: Selling & Distribution Overhead | ||
Heat, Light & Power (1/10 × 65,000) | 6,500 | |
Depreciation on Buildings (1/10 × 4% × 2,00,000) | 800 | |
Sales Commission | 33,600 | |
Sales Travelling | 11,000 | |
Sales Promotion | 22,500 | |
Distribution department salaries & wages | 18,000 | 92,400 |
Cost of Sales | 7,14,020 |
Condensed Profit and Loss Account for the year ended 31-12-2022
Particulars | (₹) | Dr. (₹) | Particulars | (₹) | Cr. (₹) |
To Cost of Sales | 7,14,020 | By Sales | 7,68,000 | ||
To Interest on Borrowings | 2,000 | Less: Sales Return | 14,000 | 7,54,000 | |
Add: Accrued | 2,000 | 4,000 | |||
To Profit (Bal. fig.) | 35,980 | ||||
7,54,000 | 7,54,000 |
Illustration 8
PR Ltd manufactures and sells a typical brand of Tiffin Boxes under its on brand name. The installed capacity of the plant is 1,20,000 units per year distributable evenly over each month of calendar year. The Cost Accountant of the company has informed the following cost structure of the product, which is as follows:
Raw Material | Amount(₹) |
Direct Labour | ₹ 20 per unit. |
Direct Expenses | ₹ 12 per unit. |
Expenses | ₹ 2 per unit |
Variable Overheads | ₹ 16 per unit |
Fixed Overheads | ₹ 3,00,000 |
₹ 7,500 per month upto 50% capacity and additional ₹ 2,500 per month for every additional 25% capacity utilization or part thereof.
The plant was operating at 50% capacity during the first seven months of the calendar year 2022, at 100% capacity in the remaining months of the year.
The selling price for the period from 1st January, 2022 to 31st July, 2022 was fixed at ₹ 69 per unit. The firm has been monitoring the profitability and revising the selling price to meet its annual profit target of ₹ 8,00,000.
You are required to suggest the selling price per unit for the period from 1st August, 2022 to 31st December, 2022.
Prepare Cost Sheet clearly showing the total and per unit cost and also profit for the period.
Solution:
Capacity Utilisation Period | 50% Capacity 1st January – 31st July | 100% Capacity 1st August– 31st December |
||
Units | 1,20,000/ 12 × 7 × 50% = 35,000 | 1,20,000/ 12 × 7 × 100% = 50,000 | ||
Raw Material | 20 × 35,000 | 7,00,000 | 20 × 50,000 | 10,00,000 |
Direct Labour | 12 × 35,000 | 4,20,000 | 12 × 50,000 | 6,00,000 |
Direct Expenses | 2 × 35,000 | 70,000 | 2 × 50,000 | 1,00,000 |
Variable Overheads | 16 × 35,000 | 5,60,000 | 16 × 50,000 | 8,00,000 |
Fixed Overheads | 3,00,000/ 12 × 7 | 1,75,000 | 3,00,000/ 12 × 5 | 1,25,000 |
Semi-Variable Overhead | 7,500 × 7 | 52,500 | 12,500 × 5 | 62,500 |
Total Cost | 19,77,500 | 26,87,500 | ||
Profit (WN 1) | 4,37,500 | 3,62,500 | ||
Sales (WN 2) | 69 × 35,000 | 24,15,000 | 30,50,000 | |
Selling Price per unit (WN 2) | 69 | 30,50,000/ 50,000 | 61 | |
Cost per unit | 19,77,500/ 35,000 | 56.50 | 26,87,500/ 50,000 | 53.75 |
Working Notes:
1. Selling Price for 1st January – 31st July = ₹69
⸫ Sales = 69 × 35,000 = ₹ 24,15,000
Profit for 1st January – 31st July = 24,15,000 – 19,77,500 = ₹ 4,37,500
2. Expected total profit for the year ₹ 8,00,000
Profit to earn from 1st August – 31st December = 8,00,000 – 4,37,500 = ₹ 3,62,500
Expected Sale from 1st August – 31st December = ₹ 30,50,000
Expected Selling price per unit from 1st August – 31st December = ₹ 30,50,000/ 50,000 = ₹ 61
A. Theoretical Questions:
Multiple Choice Questions:
Answer:
1 | b | 2 | d | 3 | a | 4 | b | 5 | b |
6 | c | 7 | d | 8 | d | 9 | c | 10 | d |
Ruchika Ma'am has been a meritorious student throughout her student life. She is one of those who did not study from exam point of view or out of fear but because of the fact that she JUST LOVED STUDYING. When she says - love what you study, it has a deeper meaning.
She believes - "When you study, you get wise, you obtain knowledge. A knowledge that helps you in real life, in solving problems, finding opportunities. Implement what you study". She has a huge affinity for the Law Subject in particular and always encourages student to - "STUDY FROM THE BARE ACT, MAKE YOUR OWN INTERPRETATIONS". A rare practice that you will find in her video lectures as well.
She specializes in theory subjects - Law and Auditing.
Yash Sir (As students call him fondly) is not a teacher per se. He is a story teller who specializes in simplifying things, connecting the dots and building a story behind everything he teaches. A firm believer of Real Teaching, according to him - "Real Teaching is not teaching standard methods but giving the power to students to develop his own methods".
He cleared his CA Finals in May 2011 and has been into teaching since. He started teaching CA, CS, 11th, 12th, B.Com, M.Com students in an offline mode until 2016 when Konceptca was launched. One of the pioneers in Online Education, he believes in providing a learning experience which is NEAT, SMOOTH and AFFORDABLE.
He specializes in practical subjects – Accounting, Costing, Taxation, Financial Management. With over 12 years of teaching experience (Online as well as Offline), he SURELY KNOWS IT ALL.